a recent sort-of fight with guy:
lou: i want a piece of john lurie's art and daniel johnston's art before they die.
[both are in the danger zone]
guy: really? lurie is of way greater value. his art is much better than johnston's.
lou: what? i don't think so! i think if you only looked at some of johnston's art you might think that - a lot of it is underdeveloped and messy - but there are some like the one i posted that are way better than lurie's.
[keep in mind, john lurie owns a MUCH bigger piece of my heart]
guy: i don't think so. well, whatever.
lou: i want both. you don't want both?
guy: (silent)
so, things are really looking up around here! and don't think i'm kiddin'!
CHECK!
ps. looking back on this argument, i would say that guy won and i think i was wrong on this one. see lurie art below.
2 comments:
If that's what you guys call an argument then you are a LOT better off than anyone thought! Either that or maybe you both take ART way too seriously.
I like my artsy with a bit of the fartsy.
Post a Comment